W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Specref API

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:12:52 +0200
Message-ID: <51C96D24.2000605@w3.org>
To: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
CC: spec-prod@w3.org, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
On 25/06/2013 12:09 , Tobie Langel wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Robin Berjon wrote:
>> The only thing that I care about from the ReSpec point of view is
>> performance. If you're only adding a few fields, it probably
>> doesn't matter, but if you're adding enough that the output might
>> start being noticeably slower to load and parse, then I'd rather
>> the API that ReSpec uses stayed lean and mean.
>
> Most requests are clocking well above a single packet, so I don't
> think even doubling the size of the output would have a significant
> perf impact.

That WFM. Incidentally, I wonder if gzip might help here. I should take 
the time to look at what kind of performance impact the current usage 
has to see if it's worth optimising or not (I suspect not, but where 
performance is concerned gut feelings are almost always wrong :).

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2013 10:12:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:18 UTC