W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Using the W3C publication process vocabulary

From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 12:22:34 -0400
Message-ID: <51C720CA.6040002@w3.org>
To: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
CC: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On 06/23/2013 09:34 AM, Tobie Langel wrote:
> While you're at it, would it make sense to add the OGP and Twitter meta-data for when specs are linked/shared using those services?

That's another good idea. Do you have an example of things you'd like to 
see? We should probably look at schema.org as well.

Also, remember that the priority would be for the pubrules toolchain to 
consume this data, not Facebook :-)

Alexandre.

>
> Full disclosure: I'm a W3C fellow, fully employed by Facebook and OGP was originally created at Facebook.
>
> --tobie
>
>
> On Sunday, June 23, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Niklas Lindström wrote:
>
>> Checking prefix.cc (http://prefix.cc):
>>
>> * w3p: common for <http://prov4j.org/w3p/> and <http://purl.org/provenance/>
>> * rec: common for <http://purl.org/ontology/rec/core#>
>> * tr: no usage reported.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Niklas
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org (mailto:ivan@w3.org)> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Bertails wrote:
>>>> On 06/23/2013 07:27 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>>>>> The RDF file that are used internally usually use the 'rec' prefix for this one.
>>>>> But, well, *shrug*, that is not a strong argument...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why not "tr:" then?
>>>
>>> Works for me, too.
>>>
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alexandre.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ivan
>>>>>
>>>>> Shane McCarron wrote:
>>>>>> In order to enhance the RDFa support in ReSpec, I am going to include an
>>>>>> indication of the specification status using the vocabulary
>>>>>> at http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54 - see http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54.n3
>>>>>> if you want to view one version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My plan is to use the prefix 'w3p' for this unless there is an existing commonly
>>>>>> used prefix for this vocabulary. If anyone has an opinion on this, please don't
>>>>>> hesitate to chime in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Shane P. McCarron
>>>>>> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>>> mobile: +31-641044153 (tel:%2B31-641044153)
>>> http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me
>>
>
>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 23 June 2013 16:22:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:18 UTC