Re: Regarding XHTML format output

And it was (relatively) easy to fix.  I have not committed the changes nor
done a pull request yet.    I am going to extend it so that it can support
xhtml1, xhtml5, or html5.  That's easy too and it means we can do it all.


On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 11:46 -0500, Shane McCarron wrote:
> > Sorry - this was with Respec.
>
> Thanks for explaining. Yes, supporting XHTML is still useful, I agree.
>
> Liam
>
> --
> Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
> Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
> Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
>
>


-- 
Shane P. McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.