- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:35:06 +0200
- To: shane@aptest.com
- Cc: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
Find that gross? I'm all ears for a better solution. Using localBiblio in that case seemed like the most lightweight option. Concerning the pull request, let me get back to you separately. TR/ is being completely revamped, and I'm hoping that we should be able to completely automate all W3C specs including the ones which aren't sourced for now. --tobie On Thursday, June 20, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Shane McCarron wrote: > Gross. Does that mean I should cancel the pull request I just submitted? > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org (mailto:tobie@w3.org)> wrote: > > In that case, the best solution is to use a local biblio[1] for those three until you publish. > > > > --tobie > > > > [1]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2012OctDec/0031.html > > > > > > On Thursday, June 20, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Shane McCarron wrote: > > > > > rdfa-core, xhtml-rdfa, and html-rdfa are all changing state next week. But of course they are inter-dependent and we need to generate them now so we can pubrules check etc. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org (mailto:tobie@w3.org) (mailto:tobie@w3.org)> wrote: > > > > It's going to get overwritten the next time we sync. > > > > > > > > Currently sync is manual, but is done frequently (once a week or so). > > > > > > > > Some specs are in a little bit of a mixed state right due to issues in TR/ which are in the process of getting fixed. Which sourced specs would you need to update? > > > > > > > > --tobie > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, June 20, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Shane McCarron wrote: > > > > > > > > > That's helpful - thanks. I note that some things say the source is the tr.rdf document from the W3C. If I update an entry that was sourced from there by hand what hapens? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net (mailto:markus.lanthaler@gmx.net) (mailto:markus.lanthaler@gmx.net) (mailto:markus.lanthaler@gmx.net)> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Shane, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, June 20, 2013 3:47 PM, Shane McCarron wrote: > > > > > > > I am trying to update a couple of specs today. In the process I am > > > > > > > switching them over to the Latest ReSpec at the W3C. I also need to > > > > > > > update a couple of references that these specs use, and of course > > > > > > > update the central collection of references *about* these specs so > > > > > > > that other things that reference them reference the right thing.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is the current best practice for doing this? > > > > > > > > > > > > The biblio DB has been moved to this repository: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/tobie/specref > > > > > > > > > > > > Look for the bilbio.json file > > > > > > (https://github.com/tobie/specref/blob/master/biblio.json), edit it and > > > > > > finally open a pull request. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope this helps > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Markus Lanthaler > > > > > > @markuslanthaler > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Shane P. McCarron > > > > > Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Shane P. McCarron > > > Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. > > > > > > > -- > Shane P. McCarron > Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2013 15:35:17 UTC