- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:28:43 +0200
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: spec-prod@w3.org
On 11/10/2012 10:49 , Shane McCarron wrote: > I see that respec3 has a test suite of sorts, and when I make changes I > would like to test them, but it is not clear to me how to *run* the > tests. Mostly because I am obtuse I expect. Is there documentation on > how to set up a local git repository so I can test before I commit my > changes? You're not obtuse — none of this is documented (which I intend to fix, but not this very second). One of the design decisions in RSv3 was to ensure that editors could use it locally, without setting up a local web server, while at the same time making use of templates and a host of resources that would be impossible to load from a file: origin. So there's a build step that packages everything up into one nice script file. But if you're hacking on the actual code and want to test it, the build step's a PITA. So the solution is to point a local web server to the root of the repo, and open SpecRunner.html from there. It'll run everything, which in some cases can take a while. You're usually better off just running the parts that you're working on. I think that test-writing should be relatively self-documented. It's using Jasmine (http://pivotal.github.com/jasmine/) which isn't wonderful but gets the job done. One very useful trick for testing: when you load a ReSpec document, you can append configuration information to its URL as part of the query string, e.g. foo.html?specStatus=FPWD;publishDate=1977-03-15;maxToc=5 and it will override the doc's configuration. So if you want to test a bunch of variations for a feature, you only need to have one document (that may already exist, e.g. simple.html) and you can set the config in that way. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2012 09:28:47 UTC