- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 16:35:25 +0200
- To: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
- Cc: spec-prod@w3.org
Hi Dan, On May 17, 2012, at 15:07 , Dan Burnett wrote: > I have reviewed the official html docs, but I can't seem to find a way to correct for the crucial differences below. Can anyone suggest what parameters I need to set or help me understand what changes I need to make to fix these? > > - Previous version link is missing (specified as previousURI: "http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc-20120112.html") > > - Custom copyright line is missing (specified as overrideCopyright: ((our text here)) ) > > - SOTD has the inappropriate sentence "The group does not expect this document to become a W3C Recommendation." inserted! Is this because the document is an ED? If so, why the change? It's clear that it's an editor's draft anyway without this sentence. > > - There seems to be no WebIDL Dictionary support -- all IDL, document sections, and corresponding ToC entries are missing. > > - in WebIDL, the Constructor parameters seem to be missing > > - in WebIDL, array type attribute now has [] added in the description, which looks weird: "remoteStreams of type array of MediaStream[]". It makes it look like it's an array of an array, which it isn't. These issues seem strange — I can't reproduce all of them using RSv2. I suspect something quite fishy is going on. Can you try to point to v3 instead and tell me how it goes? Hopefully this should make your life *a lot* easier (it was made for that :). The link to try is http://darobin.github.com/respec/builds/respec-w3c-common.js. > Also, I could not figure out how to reference ReSpec2 via a URI as with ReSpec.js, so I had to download and use a local copy. This is likely because I am unfamiliar with Mercurial. Does anyone know if there is a way to reference the official version of ReSpec2 via a simple URI? Yes, the canonical v2 link was http://respec.specifiction.com/js/profiles/w3c-common.js — but please try v3 instead! -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2012 14:36:27 UTC