- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 10:38:38 -0500
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Spec Prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
On 18 May 2010, at 10:28 AM, Robin Berjon wrote: > On May 18, 2010, at 15:22 , Dan Connolly wrote: >> On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 11:45 +0200, Robin Berjon wrote: >>> Well, the primary reason is that, as usual, tools are perfectly >>> well hidden deep inside dated space so that they can't ever be >>> found :) >> >> It is indeed frustrating that the recent redesign clipped some >> links/paths from the tech reports page to the tool, >> but I don't think "dated space" has much to do with findability. > > In this case, indeed not, but if one can't complain about dated > space also in bad faith then is life really worth living? > >> It's the top search hit for "bibliography generator" on our site >> (or "w3c bibliography generator" on your favorite search engine). >> That does require knowing it exists. > > Yup. I searched for various things (I think "bibliography database" > might have been one of them) when I was looking into this but I > didn't stumble upon this tool. Is there a master list of all tools? > I would find that quite useful (but I'm guessing that there's no way > to automate the generation of such a list). The editor's home page has a list: http://www.w3.org/2003/Editors/ Linked from the Guidebook. http://www.w3.org/Guide/ _ Ian -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:38:42 UTC