- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:14:50 -0500
- To: Spec Prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4BC870DA.9000502@aptest.com>
No - it's the same script. I didn't push the update into that repository yet. There are a number of bugs fixed, but there is still something weird about how it interacts with ReSpec.js that I am trying to run down. I will keep you posted. W.r.t. ReSpec.js and the default engine, I don't mind if it is on my server or yours. My server is a massive machine at DreamHost that has unlimited storage, bandwidth, CPU, etc... so I am happy to leave it there rather than burden the W3C servers any more than they already are. I will keep you posted! Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Hi Shane, > > Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 08:38 -0500, Shane McCarron a écrit : > >>> Ideally, for simplicity's sake, it would be nice if ReSpec came out >>> of the box with a default URI for such diffs. I understand if you'd >>> rather we didn't use the one at your site. There's one carefully >>> hidden in datedspace at http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff (see >>> http://esw.w3.org/HtmlDiff for a list). >>> >>> >> I dont mind hardcoding mine. Mine is on a server with lots of spare >> cycles and I have fixed some bugs in it. The one at that date space >> location won't work with ReSpec.js as is. >> > > I would be happy to update the script behind > http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff if you have a new version that would > handle ReSpec better. I didn't see an update in your CVS repository: > http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/htmldiff/htmldiff so > maybe this is an entirely different script? > > Thanks, > > Dom > > > >
Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 14:15:24 UTC