- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:06:57 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>, spec-prod@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1155233217.17437.1.camel@jebediah>
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 12:49 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 12:41 -0500, Ian B. Jacobs wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 12:27 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > > > [1] section "Document Identifiers" of pubrules, > > > which doesn't seem to have a handy fragment to refer to. > > > http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules?uimode=filter&uri= > > > > > > It's not very explicit about what "this version" means. > > > > See: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/#versioning > > Ah; I didn't think to look there. > > > That's on the TR page for people who come to read specs. I don't know > > whether that info is better there or somewhere in pubrules. If left > > where it is, it's useful to link to it from pubrules, > > yes, please. And from http://www.w3.org/2005/05/tr-versions , perhaps. > And maybe from http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri ... and that Added to both. > reminds me of http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI , which is another > place to consider adding a link. Not added; I'm not ready to look at that document closely. _ Ian > > which I don't > > believe is currently the case. > > > > DanC, do you have a preference? > > Where it is makes sense to me. > > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 18:07:31 UTC