- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:03:55 -0500
- To: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>
- Cc: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>, spec-prod@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 17:04:17 UTC
What if we remove the "#" entry entirely? _ Ian On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:02 -0700, Susan Lesch wrote: > Thomas Baker wrote: > > Section 12 of the Manual of Style says that "number sign" > > should be preferred to "crosshatch" when referring to the > > symbol "#". > > > > It may be worth noting that in the context of discussing > > identifiers, e.g. in [2], this symbol is referred to as a > > "hash". > > Changed to: > > usually not pound sign, hash, crosshatch or octothorpe > but hash namespace in SKOS Core > > Or is the use wider than SKOS? Maybe you will know a better way to describe > the exception. Thank you. > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/ > > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-vocab-pub-20060314/ > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 17:04:17 UTC