- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 09:25:01 +0100
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: spec-prod@w3.org, www-qa@w3.org
Received on Monday, 9 January 2006 08:26:23 UTC
Hi Bjoern, Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 07:46 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit : > I think that a complete stand-alone reference for this format will > encourage more working groups to make use of it rather than no formal > grammar or some other format instead, encourage to make normative > reference to it rather than copy and paste some extended subsets across > multiple technical reports, encourage tool development around EBNF which > will then help to verify the technical reports, which in turn further > encourages making use of it. A very interesting suggestion, indeed. > It will also help me to introduce {min,max} > quantifiers into EBNF. > > Writing the specification should be an easy mostly copy'n'paste job. Would you mind draft such a document, then? The QA IG could certainly publish it as a Note after some review time. Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Monday, 9 January 2006 08:26:23 UTC