- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: 28 Oct 2003 16:55:39 +0100
- To: Francois Yergeau <FYergeau@alis.com>
- Cc: spec-prod@w3.org, ijacobs@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1067356545.10799.15566.camel@stratustier>
Le mar 28/10/2003 à 16:16, Francois Yergeau a écrit : > I tried it with http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml: > > The poor editors have evaporated, but also it missed the Second Edition > (http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006). The editors are not given in the original data (which could be fixed pretty easily, I gather), so there is nothing I can do about that in the tool. I fixed the bug with regard to 1ed/2ed (hopefully). It's likely to break with XML 3rd ed, though, I'll need to do a smarter algorithm, at some point. > Trying the latter, I get: > > Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition) > , T. Bray, J. Paoli, C. , E. Maler, Editors, [snip] > > Some editors, but poor Michael Sperberg-McQueen reduced to a mere "C."! Fixed. > I tried a couple more Recs that have Second Editions: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/ gets the 1st ed. Should be fixed for all 2nd ed. > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/ doesn't work, must remove the trailing /, then > it gets the 1st ed. The URI accepted by the system is the one referenced in tr.rdf, which itself is (supposingly) the one given by the document itself. And indeed, """ Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11 """ http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11 Thanks for the feedback! Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2003 11:01:22 UTC