RE: Style of third level sections...

I agree it doesn't look too good when there's lots of bold text around. One
answer might be to use less bold text... and (in the case of the Data Model
spec) to avoid using <code> in a heading.

Michael Kay

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Norman Walsh [mailto:Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM] 
> Sent: 23 September 2003 17:13
> To: spec-prod@w3.org
> Cc: w3c-query-editors@w3.org
> Subject: Style of third level sections...
> 
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> In W3C Specifications,
> 
> - - First level sections are very large, bold, and blue.
> 
> - - Second level sections are large, normal weight, and blue.
> 
> - - Third level sections are normal size, bold, and black.
> 
> I find the transition from "blue" to "black" very jarring. In 
> particular, these sections lose the appearance of being 
> section dividers.
> 
> This problem is particularly noticable in documents like the 
> XSL/XML Query Data Model where paragraphs discussing infoset 
> properties often contain a fair amount of bold text.
> 
> Is there any possibility that a different style might be applied?
> 
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
> 
> - -- 
> Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM    | What are the thoughts of the canvas on which
> XML Standards Architect | a masterpiece is being created? "I 
> am being Web Tech. and Standards | soiled, brutally treated 
> and concealed from Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | view." Thus men 
> grumble at their destiny,
>                         | however fair.--Jean Cocteau 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 
> <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
> 
> 
> iD8DBQE/cHDCOyltUcwYWjsRAtr7AKCRu5P63YIZ20TouYENATPWSqHNjwCfU3Xq
> eGuOuZEwo1qdygq4QUf98p0=
> =xR43
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>