RFC 2606 compliance of link checker or something

It seems that whichever tool it is that allows the example.org URIs is 
somewhat too liberal ...
It probably allows example.XXX where XXX is any top-level domain, that is not 
what is written.

Jeremy


----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Subject: Re: TEST: last call candidate
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 19:53:27 +0300
From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org

>     oiled     http://oiled.man.example.uk/test#

I had changed it from oiled.man.ac.uk; I believed that the URI is fine.

(Pubrules accepts it as OK)

However reading the RFC

http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2606.txt

I discover that example.uk is not reserved, and I should have used one of
  example.org
  example.com
  example.net
  example


I believe pubrules would barf on oiled.man.example, so I propose to use
oiled.man.example.net

I am assuming that Sean and Ian prefer to have some (subtle) credit given to
the oiled tool ....

Otherwise, we could just make it

xmlns:eg = "http://example.net/"

Jeremy

-------------------------------------------------------

Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2003 16:51:17 UTC