- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 03:32:28 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- cc: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@cardiff.com>, "'spec-prod@w3.org'" <spec-prod@w3.org>
There is a mailing list and archive - w3c-tools@w3.org archived at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-tools - maybe this is the appropriate place to record this stuff (but it doesn't have anyone maintaining an associated Web page, and as list maintainer I don't have time to volunteer. Chaals On 6 Sep 2002, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: > >Le jeu 05/09/2002 à 20:29, Micah Dubinko a écrit : >> I would welcome having the W3C stylistic checker work on protected >> documents. > >It does now :) > >> Also, it would be _really_ nice to have an "editor's home page" that keeps >> links the latest tools. (Is there such a page already?) >> Is there any reason why the latest versions of the three >> tools in Dom's message couldn't be linked to >> http://validator.w3.org? > >I'm not sure the validator is the best place for it, since it has a much >broader audience than these tools might want to have (esp. the stylistic >and the pubrules checkers). > >Another possible place would be http://www.w3.org/QA/Tools , but I'm not >sure these tools fit well this page either. > >I'll add links from the WG guidebook [1]. > >Dom > >1. http://www.w3.org/Guide/#Tools > -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles tel: +61 409 134 136 SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe ------------ WAI http://www.w3.org/WAI 21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia fax(fr): +33 4 92 38 78 22 W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Friday, 6 September 2002 03:32:36 UTC