- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 14:50:35 +0200
- To: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk, spec-prod@w3.org
I tend to use the Oxford comma myself: too much risk of ambiguity otherwise in lists such as "Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and Waterstones". To me, "XML, Schema and DTD" reads like a list of two things not of three. But then I tend to follow Fowler in such matters. Michael Kay > -----Original Message----- > From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk] > Sent: 03 September 2002 10:58 > To: spec-prod@w3.org > Subject: Oxford comma in altlocs rendering > > > > I register a _very_ minor quibble with the way the altlocs > list is rendered. I find "a, b, and c" very odd, > particularly when the list members are short, as in "XML, > Schema, and DTD". I much prefer "a, b and c", i.e. "XML, > Schema and DTD". > > Alternatively, give me a template rule and I'll override both > the rule > and the elt decl and make altlocs be mixed content and then I > can suit myself! > > ht > -- > Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, > University of Edinburgh > W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team > 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) > 131 650-4440 > Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk > URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ > [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without > it is forged spam] >
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 08:51:15 UTC