- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 15:53:10 +0100
- To: spec-prod@w3.org
- cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
I don't think it's a good idea to have both http://www.w3.org/Guide/pubrules as a subset of http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/ This duplication will lead to confusion. I think we should only carry forward the second one, the Manual of Style, using a checkpoint layout with priorities 1, 2, 3 (much like the WAI guidelines), and assign P1 to pubrules checkpoints, with a policy enforcing level A. We also need to understand how the QA Spec guidelines (no PD yet, but talking about conformance assertion, testability of specs, etc) is going to integrate and interface with these/this documents.
Received on Friday, 1 March 2002 09:53:15 UTC