- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 21:01:35 -0500 (EST)
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- cc: <spec-prod@w3.org>
On the first occurrence I prefer to see it spelled out as per the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF;) style above. I don't believe that in that case it needs to be marked up further. with a title, although I would include the abbr element itself: <p>Internet Engineering Task Force (<abbr>IETF</abbr>)... After that I would simply mark it with the element and the title attribute: <abbr title="Extensible Markup Language">XML</abbr> The difference between abbr and acronym, as near as I can discover, is that an acronym is bronounced as a word, where as and abbreviation is pronounced as an initialism or the full term is pronounced: Which would make the following things abbr: IBM, IETF, W3C, etc, XML and the following acronyms (some of these are now more generally thought of as real words): NATO, laser, QANTAS, ANZUS, WCAG (pronounced normally as a word). But this comes from Spanish linguists - the support for a difference in english is less clear (maybe becuase there is an official version of Spanish, but none of english), and in the specification of HTML it is non-existent. Charles McCN On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: Hi, Section 11.5 requires TRs to spell out acronyms and initialisms in their first occurrence. An example given is "Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)" WCAG wants the same thing, but wants authors to use the title attribute for the expansion, an example given is <P>Welcome to the <ACRONYM title="World Wide Web">WWW</ACRONYM>! Combining these two requirements, one would end up with something like <p><acronym title='North Atlantic Treaty Organisation'>NATO</acronym> (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation)</p> or the other way round <p>North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (<acronym title='North Atlantic Treaty Organisation'>NATO</acronym>)</p> This seems to be a bit overambitious. Is "spell out" satisfied with a title attribute? In general, I prefer the style as in the IETF example, i.e. acronym follows expansion, do I still need to use the title attribute in this case? Further, given a document on XML, does the specification need to use the <acronym> [1] element each time the string 'XML' occurs and should it always expand the initialism in the title attribute? [1] XML is an initialism, not an acronym... regards, -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Saturday, 29 December 2001 21:01:37 UTC