- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 12:22:11 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- cc: <spec-prod@w3.org>
Oh, I want there to be as few links as possible - and as much flexibility about what they mean as possible. So I can say "show me all the links" really easily, or so I can say "what types of links are there here?" easily. I would prefer one link element - using a decent CSS tool I can rpesent them how I like (if not via XSLT, or some nasty PERL hack, or ...) chaals On 22 Oct 2001, Norman Walsh wrote: / Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org> was heard to say: | And there are bound to be others I haven't thought of or haven't needed | myself. My question had nothing to do with how many types of links there are (an unbounded set, probably), but with one aspect of the mechanics of linking. Do you want a discrete element for each possible type of link, or do you want a small number of linking elements and a little sophistication in the tools that render them? Be seeing you, norm -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Monday, 22 October 2001 12:22:12 UTC