- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: 22 Oct 2001 11:33:28 -0400
- To: spec-prod@w3.org
/ "Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@sun.com> was heard to say:
| At 12:05 PM 10/21/01 -0400, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
| >well, if we added some RDF into the document...
|
| Right -- either RDF, or XLink arc roles that are harvestable as RDF if
| you wish... My point was that you can't tell by inspection what the
| semantic is; a human has to decide and record it.
Well, that may be true in the general case, but an xref to a bibl is
probably a bibref and an xref to a div is probably a specref, etc.
Individual elements work fine when there are only a few, but how many do you want?
specref
bibref
glossref
tableref
figureref
prodref
protoref
funcref
...
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | To create a little flower is the labour of
XML Standards Engineer | ages.--Blake
XML Technology Center |
Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
Received on Monday, 22 October 2001 11:33:35 UTC