- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: 17 Oct 2001 16:20:14 -0400
- To: spec-prod@w3.org
/ Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> was heard to say:
| At 10:57 AM 17/10/01 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
| >DocBook Articles vs. XMLSpec
|
| How about the psychological issues? We have had trouble
| getting people to use XML at all for drafts; getting them
| to wrap their minds around docbook as a precondition for
| drafting specs is potentially a pretty strong disincentive.
Or an incentive. There are countless projects using DocBook now, so
for at least some people it'd be *less* to learn :-)
But I get your point.
| Having said that, there's certainly a lot of infrastructure
| in place for docbook. -Tim
Uh huh.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | Resist the urge to hurry; it will only slow
XML Standards Engineer | you down--Bruce Eckel
XML Technology Center |
Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2001 16:20:16 UTC