- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: 17 Oct 2001 16:20:14 -0400
- To: spec-prod@w3.org
/ Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> was heard to say: | At 10:57 AM 17/10/01 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote: | >DocBook Articles vs. XMLSpec | | How about the psychological issues? We have had trouble | getting people to use XML at all for drafts; getting them | to wrap their minds around docbook as a precondition for | drafting specs is potentially a pretty strong disincentive. Or an incentive. There are countless projects using DocBook now, so for at least some people it'd be *less* to learn :-) But I get your point. | Having said that, there's certainly a lot of infrastructure | in place for docbook. -Tim Uh huh. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | Resist the urge to hurry; it will only slow XML Standards Engineer | you down--Bruce Eckel XML Technology Center | Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2001 16:20:16 UTC