- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 10:34:36 -0500
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- CC: spec-prod@w3.org
Norman Walsh wrote: [...] > Q3: Can this be addressed organizationally? Could the W3C be persuaded > to accept DocBook documents as specs? Could OASIS be persuaded to > accept XMLSpec? W3C accepts XMLspec just like it accepts postscript, PDF, and other representations; there's no reason it wouldn't accept DocBook in the same way... that is: as an alternative representation. We still require HTML (with particular constraints) as the official version. How the HTML is produced is up to the editor. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2001 11:34:38 UTC