Re: Change in xmlspec.xsl for editors' copies

* Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM> [2001-08-15 07:37-0400]
> / Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org> was heard to say:
> | 2) When other-doctype's value is "editors-copy", the W3C logo is not
> | show and the status says:
> | 
> |   This document is an editors' copy that has absolutely no standing.
> 
> I would personally have been a little less blunt. Perhaps
> 
>    This document is an editors' copy that has no official standing.
> 
> (The document does presumably stand as an editorial draft :-)

Agreed.

> | Editors' copies have the following mark-up:
> | 
> | 	<spec w3c-doctype="other" other-doctype="editors-copy">
> | 
> | If people are happy with those changes, I will commit them.
> 
> Fine by me.

I actually changed that in favor of your proposal:

> | Also, other-doctype="editors-copy" could override the value of
> | w3c-doctype so that a standard style sheet could be used instead of a
> | TR one, and we could have something like:
> | 
> | 	<spec w3c-doctype="cr" other-doctype="editors-copy">
> | 
> | If that's desirable, I will edit the style sheet and propose a change
> | to the documentation[3].
> 
> Perhaps we need to factor this differently. Maybe we need:
> 
>   <spec w3c-doctype="cr" role="editors-copy">
> 
> and
> 
>   <spec w3c-doctype="other" other-doctype="something random" role="editors-copy">
> 
> I don't like the idea of using other-doctype when w3c-doctype isn't "other".

That makes sense.

I have modified my copy of the style sheet to incorporate those 2
changes.

The diff against the latest version from CVS is attached.

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - tel:+1-617-452-2092