- From: Eve L. Maler <Eve.Maler@east.sun.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:57:47 -0400
- To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: spec-prod@w3.org, ij@w3.org
[Ian, are you actually on spec-prod? I wasn't sure, so I copied you.] At 05:17 PM 7/21/00 -0700, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: >This said, I don't think it's enough. I'm affraid every group uses the >spec.dtd in a different way, and the sources are quite different. >Different processors and/or stylesheets are used and the same markup can >lead to two different things in the generated document and vice versa. >It'd be better if that wasn't the case. Obviously, using the same >stylesheet would help avoiding this, but because the DOM requires a lot >more processing (to generate the IDL, Java, etc...) than most specs >there is little hope we can all use the same tool. So, I wonder what >could be done to try and help everybody to use the DTD the same way. I think an important component of ensuring this whole thing works is to write up some clear markup/editorial guidelines. I haven't done this yet because there has been no "canonical" stylesheet, but I think there may be quite a few specs using the one I use by now, and that will have increased their editorial compatibility. I think it would take one solid day to figure out the desired guidelines, and then someone (Ian? me?) could write them up. It helps that I could easily go into Cambridge for meetings. Eve -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center elm @ east.sun.com
Received on Monday, 24 July 2000 10:56:56 UTC