- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 18:14:39 -0500
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- CC: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, spec-prod@w3.org
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: [...] > I agree with you about extensibility. (A digression - it would be nice if > class values could be URIs and we could use RDF to describe them and have > some hope of extneding in a way that we could keep track of, Great minds think alike! See: "using grounded HTML link relationships, grounded class names as semantic hooks " http://www.w3.org/2000/07/hs78/#link and an example http://www.w3.org/2000/07/hs78/algernon was finishing the documentation, but gotta go now. > but that breaks > CSS in many cases, yes, but I found a way to do it that's pretty clean. take a look at style.css in /hs78/ > unless we want to fill things with escaped character, and > I don't.) -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 21 July 2000 19:14:44 UTC