- From: Eve L. Maler <elm@east.sun.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 22:17:29 -0500
- To: eduardo.gutentag@eng.sun.com
- Cc: "Eve L. Maler" <elm@east.sun.com>, spec-prod@w3.org, bent@exemplary.net, nwalsh@arbortext.com, ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk, eduardo@eng.sun.com
Well, yes. :-) But it's been an assumption so far that the input order of
the header is also the output order, so this is misleading at the very least.
Eve
At 02:58 PM 2/27/00 -0800, Eduardo Gutentag wrote:
>"Eve L. Maler" wrote:
>
> >
> > #- Allowed status and abstract to appear in the opposite order. This was a
> > longstanding bug; the DTD only allowed them in the status/abstract order,
> > but in fact the W3C publication guidelines require them in the other
> > order. I will remove the incorrect order in the next major version (V3.0).
> >
>
>Ahem. Isn't this a sytelsheet issue? ;-)
>
>Eduardo
--
Eve Maler Sun Microsystems
elm @ east.sun.com +1 781 442 3190
Received on Sunday, 27 February 2000 22:16:27 UTC