W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML

From: Marshall Rose <mrose+mtr.netnews@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 15:36:53 -0700
Message-ID: <003001bfd587$f24877c0$6d61fea9@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
To: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
Cc: "Eve L. Maler" <Eve.Maler@east.sun.com>, <spec-prod@w3.org>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Marshall Rose" <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
first, a correction: i've been writing "rfc 2222" and i meant to write "rfc
2223". oops!

> I'm not following. ...
> ASCII art is tricky. However, this bit only hassles those that need to
> present in both the IETF and W3C. One could have a graphic element type,
> an alternative type, which might even be included as the Web Accessibility
> Initiative encourages this sort of thing.

this is what i wanted to get across: something that produces output for 2223
and other more expressive formats is going to have to allow for duality...

> However, one day there might be neat SVG to ASCII art formats, AND you
> know, IETF might permit HTML/XML one day. <grin>

err, don't, uh, hold your breath...

> Do you have a public list set up for discussion of and maintaining 2629?
> not, would you mind having those discussion in this forum? Dan Connolly,
> would this be acceptable to you as the guy that started this list?

there isn't a list, per se, people send me email and sometime it gets
through [private joke to joseph]. we can certainly discuss it in this forum.
guess i'd better subscribe!

Received on Tuesday, 13 June 2000 18:37:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:07 UTC