Fwd:SMIL href attribute not explicitly mentioned for anchor element

------- Forwarded Message

Return-Path: lloyd@cwi.nl
Delivery-Date: Thu Nov 12 16:02 MET 199
Return-Path: <lloyd@cwi.nl>
Received: from sophia.inria.fr by www45.inria.fr (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA23939 for <hoschka@www45.inria.fr>; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:02:28 +0100 (MET)
Received: from www10.w3.org by sophia.inria.fr (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA24747 for <Philipp.Hoschka@sophia.inria.fr>; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:02:33 +0100 (MET)
Received: from hera.cwi.nl (hera.cwi.nl [192.16.191.1])
	by www10.w3.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA00953
	for <hoschka@w3.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 10:02:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from klipper.cwi.nl (klipper.cwi.nl [192.16.196.200]) by hera.cwi.nl with ESMTP
	id QAA16001 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:02:25 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost by klipper.cwi.nl with ESMTP
	id QAA08554; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:02:22 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <UTC199811121502.QAA08554.lloyd@klipper.cwi.nl>
To: hoschka@w3.org (Philipp Hoschka)
cc: Lloyd.Rutledge@cwi.nl
Subject: SMIL href attribute not explicitly mentioned for anchor element
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 16:02:22 +0100
From: Lloyd Rutledge <Lloyd.Rutledge@cwi.nl>
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 347


Hi Philipp,

I found what I think is a minor error in the SMIL specification.
There is no formal specification in the text of the HREF attribute
being used by the <anchor> element.  There are, however, some
casual references to the attribute being used, and it is used
in the <anchor> examples.  Can we correct this for SMIL 1.0?

Regards,
Lloyd

------- End of Forwarded Message

Received on Thursday, 12 November 1998 11:09:15 UTC