minor error in SMIL spec

------- Forwarded Message

Return-Path: lloyd@cwi.nl
Delivery-Date: Tue Nov 10 10:50 MET 199
Return-Path: <lloyd@cwi.nl>
Received: from sophia.inria.fr by www45.inria.fr (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA27192 for <hoschka@www45.inria.fr>; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 10:50:28 +0100 (MET)
Received: from www10.w3.org by sophia.inria.fr (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA22681 for <Philipp.Hoschka@sophia.inria.fr>; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 10:50:35 +0100 (MET)
Received: from hera.cwi.nl (hera.cwi.nl [192.16.191.1])
	by www10.w3.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA07108
	for <hoschka@w3.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 04:50:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from klipper.cwi.nl (klipper.cwi.nl [192.16.196.200]) by hera.cwi.nl with ESMTP
	id KAA20734 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 10:50:23 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost by klipper.cwi.nl with ESMTP
	id KAA11073; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 10:50:22 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <UTC199811100950.KAA11073.lloyd@klipper.cwi.nl>
To: hoschka@w3.org (Philipp Hoschka)
cc: Lloyd.Rutledge@cwi.nl
Subject: minor error in SMIL spec
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 10:50:21 +0100
From: Lloyd Rutledge <Lloyd.Rutledge@cwi.nl>
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 246


Hi Philipp,

I notice a minor error in the SMIL spec, probably a typo.  In section
4.2.2 for the seq element, the repeat element is described as "Defined
in Section 4.2.1".  This should be changed to "Defined in Section
4.2.4".

Regards,
Lloyd


------- End of Forwarded Message

Received on Tuesday, 10 November 1998 07:54:20 UTC