- From: Philipp Hoschka <Philipp.Hoschka@sophia.inria.fr>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 20:07:09 +0200
- To: smil-editor@w3.org
------- Forwarded Message From: Patrick Schmitz <pschmitz@microsoft.com> To: "'Philipp Hoschka'" <Philipp.Hoschka@sophia.inria.fr> Subject: RE: more work on submission Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 10:57:15 -0700 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Content-Type: text Content-Length: 2441 Hi Phillip - (I sent this once already, and got a bounce - sounds like your mail server is full). I have fixed the logo and links problems (my high-tech HTML editor inserted some links I had not intended). I had to guess at the name to be used ("NOTE-html+time-19980918"). Please note as well that one of the references I included from the SMIL spec seems not to be valid. It is the link for the "URI" entry in the references section. It was an oversight on my part to include this, as I did not reference it directly in the spec. I have removed it from the submission document. As the spec is not available on a public server, I cannot run the validator on it. I am looking for a solution on our side, but would welcome any suggestions. (I did not attach the revised version, in hopes that the smaller mail will go through). Thanks for your help. Patrick - -----Original Message----- From: Philipp Hoschka [mailto:Philipp.Hoschka@sophia.inria.fr] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 1998 8:24 AM To: Patrick Schmitz Cc: Thomas Reardon Subject: more work on submission this is what i got from the guy handling the submissions here. looks like a couple of more admin things are required. the good news: we're preparing to ack this early next week (monday to be precise) - but please don't bank on this date (e.g. prepare press release and shout at us when the date changes), the date is preliminary - I don't see reasons why the date should move today, but they may come up comments on what is required below (marked by PH:) - ------- Forwarded Message for starters: http://www.w3.org/Team/1998/09/HTML-time-sub/HTMLplusTIME.html,checklink returns several broken links that are external to our web site. The authors need to fix that. PH: i'll send you the list of broken links in a follow up message The W3C icon is missing. PH: please see other recent submissions for the format required, e.g. http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-dcd Validation is >>required<<. Their DTD was wrong, I replaced it with the correct one, and I still get a couple errors. Point them to http://validator.w3.org so they can pick up the right DTD. PH: Please use one of the HTML 4.0 DTDs, run it through the validator, and correct bugs Next: http://www.w3.org/Team/1998/09/HTML-time-sub/submission It looks all blue (problem with stylesheet ?). icon missing as usual. PH: I'll see if i can take care of that one - Renaud - ------- End of Forwarded Message ------- End of Forwarded Message
Received on Thursday, 24 September 1998 14:07:11 UTC