[smil-editors] <none>

------- Forwarded Message

Return-Path: w3t-talk-request@w3.org
Delivery-Date: Mon May 18 14:40 MET 199
Return-Path: <w3t-talk-request@w3.org>
Received: from sophia.inria.fr by www45.inria.fr (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA08623 for <hoschka@www45.inria.fr>; Mon, 18 May 1998 14:40:53 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from www10.w3.org by sophia.inria.fr (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA21732; Mon, 18 May 1998 14:40:48 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from www19.w3.org (www19.w3.org [18.29.0.19]) by www10.w3.org (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA29937; Mon, 18 May 1998 08:40:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by www19.w3.org (8.8.5/8.6.12) id IAA12269; Mon, 18 May 1998 08:40:43 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 08:40:43 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-Message-Id: <199805181240.IAA12269@www19.w3.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: lanalana.inria.fr: Host alh-pm.inria.fr [138.96.224.131] claimed to be w3.org
Message-ID: <35602C3F.AE26F268@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 14:40:31 +0200
From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@w3.org>
Organization: World Wide Web Consortium
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.29 i586)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Philipp Hoschka <Philipp.Hoschka@sophia.inria.fr>
CC: w3t-talk@w3.org
References: <199805180942.LAA07777@www45.inria.fr>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Microsoft position on SMIL
Resent-From: w3t-talk@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <w3t-talk@w3.org> archive/latest/1723
X-Loop: w3t-talk@w3.org
Sender: w3t-talk-request@w3.org
Resent-Sender: w3t-talk-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Length: 755

Philipp Hoschka wrote:
> 
> >Bert Bos wrote:
> >>
> >> There is no text in SMIL.
> >
> >The SMIL specification says otherwise:
> 
> No, it doesn't - the passage you quote is not in the proposed
> Please make sure that you cite from the proposed recommendation,
> which is at
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/PR-smil-19980409/
> 
> The passage you quote is from an earlier draft, and has been
> removed before going to proposed recommendation, since nobody
> wanted to do a second implementation (there was one by CWI).
> 

Well, I think you have a problem then. The passage I quote is definitely
in the proposed recommendation which is at the URL you give. See by
yourself Section 4.2.3.
http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/PR-smil-19980409/#media-object
- -- 
Arnaud


------- End of Forwarded Message

Received on Monday, 18 May 1998 09:10:01 UTC