- From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:03:55 +0800
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- CC: W3C Site Comemnts <site-comments@w3.org>, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
(2013/10/22 10:26), Ian Jacobs wrote: > People who post to W3C lists give W3C permission to distribute the messages in our > archives. I am not aware that posters have also given permission to others to distribute > the messages. Ok. That makes some sense, but it also seems to mean that the gmane mirrors are violating copyright? > I can ask our legal team for their views. +1 (2013/10/22 10:45), Ted Guild wrote: > This was the whole point of the NDA hoop we went through... you have > your nod to analyze what you can from our archives with the > permissions we gave your account. But I suppose I don't have the right to publish my analysis (except those that fall into the realm of fair use)? I am really unfamilar with this copyright stuff.... > We deliberately do not make full, raw emails available publicly as > they contain more and arguably personal/sensitive data not exposed in > the html archives. The html archives only give a pertinent subset of > header data. Ah, right. (Provided that copyright issue can be resolved) I think it would then be nice to have the version of .mbox that have a reduced set of headers. Perhaps this is what pipermail does? > We make the mboxes available to Members, "Invited Experts" > participating in our Working Groups and those like yourselves we deem > trustworthy. They are extremely convenient when catching up on a > mailing list to be able to import portions into a mail client, > respond with References and In-Reply-To, have history and threading > for threads that might have started before joining a group. There is > also quite a few deductions that can be made which is what we're > interested in your assistance with. The benefits are why I am asking this here. This should also be able to reduce the amount of duplicated information on any list. Cheers, Kenny -- Web Specialist, Opera Sphinx Game Force, Oupeng Browser, Beijing Try Oupeng: http://www.oupeng.com/
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2013 03:04:30 UTC