- From: Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:41:16 +0200
- To: ted@w3.org
- CC: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, "site-comments@w3.org Comemnts" <site-comments@w3.org>, Jean-Guilhem Rouel <jean-gui@w3.org>
See inline On 4/12/2013 4:32 PM, Ted Guild wrote: > On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 08:45 -0500, Ian Jacobs wrote: >>>> I thought "cool URLs don't change" at W3C :) >>>> >>>> Would there be a way to have info on that page pointing to the new >> group? Thx >>> I spoke with Ted about this. Ted indicated that search engines would >> soon pick up the 404 and >>> that listing would go away in short order. > Serving of CG area is overly complex and fragile as it is. My > understanding is the earlier area was a staging area while people came > up with a cooler URI (group shortname) and other shifts to the group. > It was not meant to be advertised (therefore not a cool URI) Well, it got out > and should > atrophy as mentioned so preference is not to have to complicate > configuration and cause potentially other issues. If you're talking about the need for a redirect on http level - I think a simple note on the old page that people should go the new page would do it, no system complexity needed. > If it doesn't clear > as expected then please consult Jean-Gui who knows this configuration > well. I'm not sure I want to recheck this regularily, but ok
Received on Friday, 12 April 2013 14:41:30 UTC