- From: Vickers, Mark <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 20:40:58 +0000
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- CC: "site-comments@w3.org" <site-comments@w3.org>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Great! Again, not high priority. Really. mav On May 18, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Ian Jacobs wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Thanks for the feedback. I recall adding a bunch of anchors to the CG process: > http://www.w3.org/community/about/ > > I'll take your advice and go add some for the cg legal agreements. > > Ian > > On 17 May 2012, at 4:05 PM, Vickers, Mark wrote: > >> In discussions with W3C legal staff and member legal staff about W3C agreements, a nice feature of some W3C agreements is that we can pass a link to a specific section of those agreements, e.g. >> >> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-exclusion-resign >> >> However, the availability of internal links in W3C agreements seems to be very inconsistent, in three categories: >> >> 1.. Visible links: The best agreements have a Table of Contents and clickable links in sections: >> >> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-exclusion-resign >> >> 2. Hidden links: Other agreements have no visible links, but the underlying document has id attributes which can be used for linking, but only by the technically savvy: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2009/12/Member-Agreement#terms >> >> 3. No links: Some agreements have no internal links at all: >> >> http://www.w3.org/community/about/agreements/cla/ >> >> It's disappointing that the more recent agreement for CGs is the least linkable! >> >> It would be great if all W3C agreements were republished consistently, with visible links to each numbered section. >> >> Note that this is not the highest-priority request. >> >> Thanks, >> mav >> >> >> >> > > -- > Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ > Tel: +1 718 260 9447 >
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 20:41:49 UTC