- From: ya knygar <knygar@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:39:07 +0000
- To: site-comments@w3.org
Hi! I have done a few mistakes in the short description -- "..RWeb, ARStandards, ARForum, W3C.." needs to be "..RWeb, AR Standards, AR Forum, W3C" http://www.w3.org/community/blog/2011/08/18/proposed-group-augmented-reality-community-group/ It would be nice if You could correct it. Thank You in advance. PS: i'm just curious as some time ago we'v faced the need in platform like W3C in software terms and we have discussed it with folks and it ended in a kind - "that's pity that W3C doesn't have the public repository with OSS code of it all, like a Mozilla, for example.: Are we missed something or it is due security reasons or else? Just - we are developing a kind of that platform now (as the existent solutions haven't suited us and we hadn't your platform's code) on the concurrent tech like in Google Wave and, while we doesn't view that platforms into a use on W3C (we'd be proud, though), we are just interested in what is with your portal development. I haven't researched really, only - it's obvious that Community site is on WordPress (we had a discussion if WordPress developers themselves helped W3C), haven't seen wiki's and other, though. BTW - Thank You for this new platform, really, i have participated in Drumbeat and i'v thought - how bad is that this kind of networking isn't present for W3C and all other major Open Organizations. I think if it would be connected (be a FedSocWeb, yeah) with a Mozilla's new Betafarm or that would grow from it -- it would really help many people all around the world. Currently i feel that Mozilla is ahead in a real l10n but still it's like a first steps. Excuse me if i'd bother you but my final curiosity - are W3C planning something for Ukraine or Russian Federation, i mean - the real Open Web Platform and promotion of it's further development for the Eastern Europe? Just maybe you'v heard something.
Received on Thursday, 18 August 2011 21:39:50 UTC