- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:30:41 -0600
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, site-comments@w3.org
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 05:44 +0100, Ivan Herman wrote: > > On 2010-2-9 18:03 , Dan Connolly wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 16:26 +0100, Ivan Herman wrote: > >> The activity home page also has a list of all working and interest > >> group, active, dormant, or closed. > > > > How do I get there from /RDF/ ? > > The wiki seems to be a closed world. > > I really do not understand this comment. Why would it be a closed world? The W3C icon at the top doesn't take me to http://www.w3.org/ like it does on every other page in the W3C site; it takes me to http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Main_Page > Put it another way, why would it be closer than the old incarnation of /RDF? > > I still do not understand what you really want. I want the decision history of our work preserved. I'm surprised to be fighting this battle repeatedly; first the link from /XML/ to Sperberg-McQueen's decision record for XML, then the link from the SPARQL pages to the DAWG and the SPARQL issues list, and now on /RDF/ and /2004/OWL/ to their decision records. It's fine for older work to get less prominent over time, but at no point should the history be just chopped off completely. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 13:30:43 UTC