- From: Jeff Sonstein <jsonstein@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:35:00 -0400
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: site-comments@w3.org, chairs@w3.org, W3C Members <w3c-ac-members@w3.org>
On Oct 14, 2009, at 3:53 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote: > Indeed, very nice job re design and usability. However, I think we > should > also take into account what our 'customers' think [1], [2]: > > "so, are #semanticweb standards too complicated when even the new > #w3c site > doesn't use them? #stopsnakeoil" > > "@iand apparently all of them: No (obvious) RDF export, no SPARQL > API. Just > some (broken!) hCalendar items." I was very pleased to see the site passes XHTML, CSS, and "508 Standards" validation and I was also rather surprised *not* to see use of the XHTML+RDFa DTD for http://www.w3.org/ nor even for http://www.w3.org/standards/semanticweb/ this redesign/relaunch would seem to be a good opportunity to showcase Web pages and sites which are part of the Semantic Web which we are "pushing" just my ever-shrinking $US 0.02 worth jeffs -- "No design survives first contact with the user." -- @bokardo on Twitter -- ============ Prof. Jeff Sonstein http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/ http://ariadne.iz.net/~jeffs/ http://chw.rit.edu/blog/ http://ariadne.iz.net/~jeffs/jeffs.asc http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/emailDisclaimer.html
Received on Thursday, 15 October 2009 09:35:05 UTC