- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:08:41 -0400
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- CC: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, site-comments@w3.org, chairs@w3.org, W3C Members <w3c-ac-members@w3.org>
Ian Jacobs wrote: > > On 14 Oct 2009, at 2:50 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote: > >> >> Ian, >> >> Indeed, very nice job re design and usability. However, I think we >> should >> also take into account what our 'customers' think [1], [2]: >> >> "so, are #semanticweb standards too complicated when even the new >> #w3c site >> doesn't use them? #stopsnakeoil" > > Hi Michael, > > We use RDF all over the place internally to manage the site. The RDF > that we use > is public: > > Group data: > http://www.w3.org/2000/04/mem-news/public-groups.rdf > > Technical reports data: > http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr.rdf > > And there's lots more, such as the Talks data. > > We don't use RDFa where we have RDF source data. > > Of course we could do more (e.g., a sparql endpoint for TR searches), > and we are likely > to do more. > > Ian > Ian, Any RDF oriented resources should be made discoverable, at the very least via <link/> based associations in <head/>. I think Plain Old Semantic HTML (POSH) is still much better than none at all :-) Anyway, here is what the current site unveils when transformed into a Linked Data Space via URIBurner [1]: http://tr.im/BMQ0 . Basically, follow: seeAlso and links_to, quite interesting data meshing unveiled etc.. Links: 1. http://uriburner.com Kingsley >> >> "@iand apparently all of them: No (obvious) RDF export, no SPARQL >> API. Just >> some (broken!) hCalendar items." >> >> This is indeed a poor message we send out - why don't we eat our own >> dogfood? We have a couple of nice standards (RDFa, GRDDL, etc.) in >> this area >> and should well be able to demonstrate that we are able to use them, >> IMHO. >> >> Sorry for spoiling the party, but given the broad uptake of semantic >> technologies in the governmental area (US, UK), the eCommerce domain >> (GoodRelations), linked data stuff and Google and Yahoo! processing >> structured data, I can't seriously explain to my colleagues or other W3C >> customers why we don't have structured data (preferably in RDF) >> available at >> the new W3C site. >> >> Thoughts, anyone? >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> >> [1] http://twitter.com/bengee/status/4856670048 >> [2] http://twitter.com/bengee/status/4856830531 >> >> -- >> Dr. Michael Hausenblas >> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre >> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway >> Ireland, Europe >> Tel. +353 91 495730 >> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ >> http://sw-app.org/about.html >> >> >> >>> From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> >>> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:07:47 -0500 >>> To: W3C Members <w3c-ac-members@w3.org> >>> Cc: <chairs@w3.org> >>> Subject: New W3C Web Site Launched >>> Resent-From: <chairs@w3.org> >>> Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:07:53 +0000 >>> >>> Dear Advisory Committee Representatives and Chairs, >>> >>> Today W3C launched its new Web site: >>> http://www.w3.org/ >>> >>> We also launched the new Member site: >>> http://www.w3.org/Member/ >>> >>> I hope that you will find the new sites more usable. You will notice >>> that some pages are missing content; we plan to continue to add >>> content over time and invite your contributions (especially from >>> Working Groups). >>> >>> I expect that over the next few days we will be fixing bugs in style >>> sheets, and so forth. Feel free to send comments to site- >>> comments@w3.org. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Ian Jacobs, Head of W3C Communications >>> >>> -- >>> Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ >>> Tel: +1 718 260 9447 >>> >>> >> >> > > -- > Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ > Tel: +1 718 260 9447 > > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Wednesday, 14 October 2009 18:09:11 UTC