- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:37:14 -0600
- To: Barney Carroll <barney.carroll@gmail.com>
- Cc: site-comments@w3.org
On 28 Nov 2009, at 8:24 AM, Barney Carroll wrote: > Hello, > > It used to be that the w3 site used a single <h1> on each page, for > the document title: on the front page this was the site title, W3C, > and on lower level pages this would be the description of that > particular document's content, eg, 'XHTML 1.1 - Module-based > XHTML' ; the proper use of numbered headings has always been > contentious, but conventional wisdom has it that one of these two > (site title or document title) was the best candidate for any given > page - what has always been pretty much unanimous was that there > should only be one, and that although the structural application of > <h#> tags didn't explicitly reflect this, they should be > hierarchical, with one top-level (<h1>) element per page. > > The re-designed pages now use two top-level headings, one for the > W3C logo and one for the document's title. Do you have any insight > on what the rationale behind this might be? Hi Barney, Traditionally I have used one h1 per page. I don't remember a strong rationale for using two h1's in the redesign, but when you look at the document outline, two sections stand out: * Initial navigation areas (which include the left navigation, which uses h2 and h3). * The body of the page. Rather than have h2's and h3's precede a unique h1, I believe we decided it would be less confusing to introduce the navigation with one h1 and the body with another. I still think that "one h1 per page" is good advice. We've adapted our page based on the global structure of the page. _ Ian > > Regards, > Barney Carroll > > barney.carroll@gmail.com > 07594 506 381 -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 17:37:25 UTC