- From: Alexander Savenkov <savenkov@xmlhack.ru>
- Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:29:12 +0400
- To: "'Ian Jacobs'" <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: <site-comments@w3.org>
Somehow, I've missed the translations link. Thanks, Ian, I think that's going to work well. Keep up the good work! -----Original Message----- From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 1:40 AM To: Alexander Savenkov Cc: site-comments@w3.org Subject: Re: The Redesign Feedback On 20 Mar 2009, at 6:40 PM, Alexander Savenkov wrote: > Ian, everyone, congratulations on the redesign! > Hi Alexander, Thank you for the feedback (and support). I've just started processing beta comments that we've received. > Obviously, an enormous amount of work has been done and even more > work is ahead. Please find some comments below: > > Did you find the new technical report style an improvement?: > Yes > > Did you find the site, overall, easier to navigate?: > Definitely, providing that the majority of the pages are migrated > into the new design. > > What do you think we can do to improve it? Feel free to mention easy > improvements and also larger-scale projects (even if we can't get to > them today). > First of all, as a (former) translator of the W3C > documents, I miss connection to the specification translations. I > suggest that in specifications where you list such things as "Is > this document a Web standard?" and "Is this the latest draft of this > specification?" another line is added, i.e. "Is there a translation > of this document?" with "No, not yet" and "Yes, please browse > through the <a href="somepage.html">list of available translations</ > a>" The translations are, in fact, linked from the right hand column of the tech reports. As an example: http://beta.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-xhtml-modularization-20090303/ In the right hand side you'll find: "translations" which links to: http://www.w3.org/2003/03/Translations/byTechnology?technology=xhtml-modular ization Right now you'll get an intervening page since the translations pages are not (yet) under the beta. But when we deploy, that link will take you directly to the translations for that document. Is this what you had in mind. > Secondly, the shadow effect on the left (e.g., main > page) looks really cheap if you ask me. There are no shadows on the > other parts of site, it might be worth removing this rudiment. Ok, noting that as part of a set of comments. > > Good luck with the rest of the redesign! > Thanks! _ Ian > Regards, > Alexander -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Friday, 10 April 2009 22:29:55 UTC