- From: Carl Myhill <Carl.Myhill@ocr.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 10:07:22 -0500
- To: <site-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CB1AD5D1B3A30B42B225AED4FE24DD5004078ECF@SHRJNTEX22.ucles.internal>
I'm looking at a comparison of WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-20060427/appendixD.html One row suggests this comparison... WCAG 1.0 2.1 <http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/wai-pageauth.html#tech-color-convey> : Ensure that all information conveyed with color is also available without color, for example from context or markup. WCAG 2.0 1.3.2 Any information that is conveyed by color <http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-20060427/appendixA.html#information bycolordef> is also visually evident without color. (Level 1) The latter is numbered incorrectly as 1.3.2 it should be 1.4.1 Can you pass this on please? Cheers Carl If you are not the intended recipient, employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this communication and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication and its attachments in error, please return the original message and attachments to the sender using the reply facility on e-mail. Internet communications are not secure and therefore Cambridge Assessment (the brand name for the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate, the constituent elements of which are CIE, ESOL and OCR [Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations is a Company Limited by Guarantee Registered in England. Registered office: 1 Hills Road, Cambridge CB1 2EU. Company number: 3484466]) does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Cambridge Assessment unless otherwise specifically stated. The information contained in this email may be subject to public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Unless the information is legally exempt from disclosure, the confidentiality of this email and your reply cannot be guaranteed.
Received on Monday, 1 September 2008 15:07:57 UTC