- From: Alexander Hartemink <amink@cs.duke.edu>
- Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 07:02:08 -0500
- To: site-comments@w3.org
two quick comments: 1. my site uses both the valid-xhtml11 and valid-css icons from w3c but they look subtly different! the former has the transparency done correctly, but the latter has some extra white pixels on the right side of the box that should be transparent but aren't. this is more easily verified by placing the icons on a dark background. i believe my browser is loading the .png files and i haven't checked the .gif files because i prefer .png. 2. i love the way that the valid xhmtl icon, when clicked, checks the "referer" so that anyone can verify that my site is valid xhtml. but the valid css icon, when clicked, does not have this behavior. rather than checking the refering page in a similar fashion, one must interact with a form and type in a uri. would it be so hard to simply load all the .css files referenced in the refering page, cascade them together, and then validate the result (perhaps by also applying the manually modified style tags in xhtml elements in the refering page)? perhaps i am missing something, which is certainly possible because i have not thought too hard about this and simply noticed that the icons behave differently: one cool and the other annoying. peace, alex
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2005 12:02:17 UTC