- From: Thomas Fischbacher <Thomas.Fischbacher@Physik.Uni-Muenchen.DE>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 15:59:34 +0200 (CEST)
- To: site-comments@w3.org
If a MathML newbie like me has a very specific problem, such as auto-generating XML code to display formulae with lots of overbars and such in them, then _certain_ pages such as http://www.w3.org/Math/testsuite/testsuite/Presentation/TokenElements/mo/moAaccent10.xml are - to state it mildly - less than helpful by lying about what's going on. We see on this page (if viewed with a MathML enabled browser) a formula with a few overbars in it, and below a block of XML code that claims to be the source for that formula. Alas, it is not. Rather, the math part is: <mrow> <mover> <mrow> <mi>G</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mo accent="false">¯</mo> </mover> <mo accent="false">+</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mrow> <mi>G</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mo accent="false">¯</mo> </mover> <mo accent="true">+</mo> <mover accent="false"> <mrow> <mi>G</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mo accent="false">¯</mo> </mover> </mrow> </math> and the text claims the math part to be: <pre> <math> <mrow> <mover> <mrow> <mi>G</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mo accent='false'>&OverBar;</mo> </mover> <mo accent='false'>+</mo> <mover accent='true'> <mrow> <mi>G</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mo accent='false'>&OverBar;</mo> </mover> <mo accent='true'>+</mo> <mover accent='false'> <mrow> <mi>G</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mo accent='false'>&OverBar;</mo> </mover> </mrow> </math> </pre> Please notice that the displayed text claims that the XML source uses <mo accent='false'>‾</mo> while indeed, it _does_ use <mo accent="false">¯</mo> Not only that the documentation makes obviously false claims here - which is a sin by itself - the ‾ construction does _not_ work with e.g. the Mozilla version in Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (Woody). Now, wouldn't it be much simpler, better, nicer, easier, and more reliable to auto-generate the "Source is ..." part from the XML math code? After all, if XML is such a hot thing, this should be no big issue at all, right? -- regards, tf@cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de (o_ Thomas Fischbacher - http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~tf //\ (lambda (n) ((lambda (p q r) (p p q r)) (lambda (g x y) V_/_ (if (= x 0) y (g g (- x 1) (* x y)))) n 1)) (Debian GNU)
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2004 10:37:15 UTC