- From: Jason P. Colyer <jpcmaddog@shaw.ca>
- Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 18:39:55 -0700
- To: site-comments@w3.org
- Message-id: <005e01c3a406$e46f3c00$6401a8c0@maddog01>
Hi there. I was on you site and used your HTML Validator. I was confused by the results. I see people that have verified their small homepages by using your software. How ever, when you view their site in the 3 major browsers being Internet Explorer, Netscape and Opera the sites would look very different. Some are font errors, spacing and text positioning. Considering I have checked over 50 sites with your software most of them being some of the largest sites on the net, your software always finds 100's or even 1,000's of errors. So are the people that design and maintain these sites wrong? Now I know that all browsers treat sites differently, but sites such as cnn.com, apple.com, microsoft.com and many other sites according to your software "fail" yet they come up perfectly So called errors in Java Script and Data Bases seem to come up. I'll give you a case in point. I bought a software package that makes Java Script Menus. Now your program claims it is full of errors. Yet it works fine on all major browsers. So am I being taken to the cleaners by the software company? Here was their remark when I asked them. Quote "The menu code will normally create two validation errors when checking the code for compliance with the HTML standards and this is also normal. What needs to be realised is that the browsers are not all fully compliant with the standards and the code that fails validation is only there to make the menu work in Netscape 4 and is ignored by the other browsers." For a further test I made a simple web page in Microsoft Front Page 2000 and the same one in Macromedia Dream Weaver XP. Both pages ran fine in all 3 major browsers with out any display errors. So I test them on your site. On average there were 60 errors. Yet they were not the same errors in either program. So I used another program called "Bobby" well their program came up with all kinds of different errors. So I tested major sites and ended up with the same results. It seems that the true test of a site is how it displays on a browser. If it can hold together on the major browsers then I feel it is error free. I feel that software like yours and others are misleading. Sincerely, Jason P. Colyer
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 20:41:49 UTC