- From: Clément Séveillac <clem@via.ecp.fr>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:39:49 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Cc: site-comments@w3.org
Hi All, On Wed, Oct 16, 2002, Joseph Reagle wrote: > On Monday 14 October 2002 08:50 am, Henri Fallon wrote: > > I guess this is for you :) > >>Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 06:45:48 -0400 (EDT) > >>From: Clément Séveillac <clem+web@via.ecp.fr> > >>To: site-comments@w3.org > >>I've found some broken links on XML Signature recommendation, part > >>9: http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sec-Schema. For instance, > >>under "RSA XML Signature Example", this link returns a 404: > >>http://www.w3.org/2000/09/signature-example-rsa.xml > >>Maybe I should read the recommendation here: > >>http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core, which is the same page without > >>broken links, but I heard any 404 is Evil anyway :-) > > Yes, the xmldsig namespace, when asking for text/html will provide you with > the actual specification without changing the active URI. However, I've now > rewritten my namespace rewrites to force an external redirection so > subsequent browsing will work properly. I presume this is what others do, > and that 303 is approriate? > > > RewriteCond %{HTTP_ACCEPT} text/html > RewriteRule ^xmldsig$ > http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmldsig-core-20020212/Overview.html [R=303,L] I am afraid the links are broken again: on http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sec-Schema, all the links: http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig-core-schema.xsd http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig-core-schema.dtd http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig-datamodel-20000112.gif http://www.w3.org/2000/09/signature-example.xml http://www.w3.org/2000/09/signature-example-rsa.xml http://www.w3.org/2000/09/signature-example-dsa.xml ...seem to return a 404. Thanks in advance, -- clem
Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 15:29:49 UTC