- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 10:11:15 -0000
- To: <public-evangelist@w3.org>, "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: <site-comments@w3.org>
"Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org> > At 23:37 +0000 2002-12-05, Jim Ley wrote: > >their design choices, I feel the W3 need to explain the rather strange > >design choice to choose the poorly supported XHTML as text/html over HTML > >4.01 - if there are good reasons for it, then we need to know them so we > >can include the same. > > One of the reason is called XSLT and RSS. If you have an XHTML page > (XML) you can easily produce an RSS feed of your page. And if you hane an XHTML version of your page you can easily produce a HTML 4.01 version of your page with XSLT. The content-management and final form versions of the page do not need to be the same. Jim.
Received on Friday, 6 December 2002 05:15:10 UTC