- From: Marwan Taher <marv@cyberia.net.lb>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 15:22:51 -0400 (EDT)
- To: <site-comments@w3.org>
Hello, With all the capabilitie of the web, HTML, XML, and all it's a bit dissapointing to arrive at Web Central (w3.org) and be confronted with lists. And lists of lists. Where's all the structure? If it's there, I can't see it. To be more concrete, the number of W3 Recommendations, Drafts, and Notes is growing and presenting all this in a mini AtoZ or as a huge list in its own page doesn't help anyone in learning and discovering these important standards. One must read a lot just to figure out what they really need to read. One gets confused about what is the current standard (HTML, XHTML (1.0 or 1.1?), XHTML Basic, Modular, which?). One doesn't really know if they need to know XML Path when learning XML Schema, or wether XML Namespaces should be studied before XML Link. What I'm requesting, oh overworked webmasters and information dispensers, is an archtiectural overview of W3 standards with some simple crisp graphs or charts to show how all the standards relate to one another. Something that can show which standard rely on which standards. What standards have superseded or have been obsoleted by what standards. Something that can inform the student of specification X what specifications A, B, and C they need to know before even attempting to look at X. Something that will show where future recommendations will fit into the big picture. The document-centric structure of W3.org is a bad example of the structural technologies it embodies. P.S. Internet Explorer 6 is completely unable to navigate the css styles page. I know its Microsoft's fault but I think having an alternate style-free page would be a good idea when you're making pages for the masses. // // Marwan Taher
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2002 17:39:18 UTC