- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:13:05 -0400
- To: Calum I Mac Leod <calum@bordernet.co.uk>
- Cc: site-comments@w3.org, koike@ay.jp.nec.com
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001, Calum I Mac Leod wrote: > Either I'm going mad, or W3.org doesn't comply, even though it's the example > given on the p3p validator page. > > lynx -head -dump www.w3.org > <snip> > Opt: "http://www.w3.org/2000/P3Pv1";ns=11 > 11-PolicyRef: /2000/06/P3P/p3p_www.xml > <snip> > > I can't see a P3P header there either, (and I find nothing in the HTML). > I've done only a little research into P3P thus far, but this all seems odd. > > http://validator.w3.org/p3p/20001215/p3p.pl?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F Your're right, our current implementation of P3P is out of date. We are working on updating it and will be done as soon as possible. Sorry for any convenience, Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C's Webmaster at MIT mailto:dom@w3.org - tel: +1-617-258-8143
Received on Monday, 18 June 2001 10:13:09 UTC