- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:11:02 -0400
- To: Lorraine Johnson <lorraine.johnson@elektrobit.com>
- Cc: site-comments@w3.org
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001, Lorraine Johnson wrote: > I didn't mean that your left-hand navigation should include all your > documents, but that all documents related to a category should be listed in > the category pages. For example, the cHTML and HDML documents should be > referenced from both the HTML and the Mobile category pages. Oh, sure, put > them at the bottom under a heading of "Things We Don't Recommend" or some > such, but at least list them in the obvious places. If not that, then add a > category at the bottom, "Unadopted Proposals," maybe. Foster care for these > unwanted orphans. All our technical reports are listed on one page: http://www.w3.org/TR/ I agree they should be linked from other pages as well, but you have to consider one point: to put a link in the HTML home page to a "thing we don't recommend" is giving it a much bigger impact than what we want: users will go and see it more often, and further more, search engines ala Google will give it a much bigger weight in their results. > In my opinion, these category pages are your best ally in fighting your > information management problem. Make these pages into tables of contents > and severely limit the introductory text. Set up a template for the > structure of each category page (section headings) and you'll find yourself > a long way to an organized site with complete linking. Some suggestions: > "Current Standards," "Previous Standards and Drafts," "Related Information," > and "Related but Not Recommended Information." It should be easy - although > tedious - to discover which documents are not referenced from anywhere and > figure out where to add the links. Most importantly, make them consistent! > > One other usability note: because most of the navigation on your home page > is accomplished through plain text links in yellow boxes, I did not register > the blue bar graphic as a navigation element at all. I saw it as part of > the header graphic information and ignored it. (Especially as it doesn't > reappear on all your other pages.) Consistency is essential in designing > navigation. Thank you very much for your input! I will do my best to ask to the different maintainers of the different pages to take them in consideration when they design and update their pages. Best regards, Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C's Webmaster at MIT mailto:dom@w3.org - tel: +1-617-258-8143
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2001 13:11:03 UTC