W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > site-comments@w3.org > August 2000

Re: Links to non-W3C standards sites?

From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:37:44 -0400
Message-ID: <39AC1108.B18B3AFB@w3.org>
To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
CC: Alex Vincent <ajvincent@hotmail.com>, site-comments@w3.org, clilley@w3.org
Ian Jacobs wrote:
> I agree wholeheartedly that we should provide links to relevant
> information from relevant pages. So if the SVG and DOM specs rely
> on IDL, they should link to the IDL definition or some relevant
> resource.

Basically, yes, we should link the IDL/ECMScript pages except that
providing a link to the OMGIDL/Ecmascript is difficult. They keep
changing their sites. I asked ECMA to maintain the old URIs but they
don't really care.

For example, this OMGIDL page is still "under construction":

The latest version of the DOM spec contains the two following links:

but I can't garantee that these links will still be available in one
or two years.

Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2000 15:37:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 18 April 2022 20:33:39 UTC