- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:37:44 -0400
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- CC: Alex Vincent <ajvincent@hotmail.com>, site-comments@w3.org, clilley@w3.org
Ian Jacobs wrote: > I agree wholeheartedly that we should provide links to relevant > information from relevant pages. So if the SVG and DOM specs rely > on IDL, they should link to the IDL definition or some relevant > resource. Basically, yes, we should link the IDL/ECMScript pages except that providing a link to the OMGIDL/Ecmascript is difficult. They keep changing their sites. I asked ECMA to maintain the old URIs but they don't really care. For example, this OMGIDL page is still "under construction": http://www.omg.org/gettingstarted/omg_idl.htm The latest version of the DOM spec contains the two following links: OMGIDL http://sisyphus.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/corba_2.htm ECMAScript http://www.ecma.ch/ecma1/STAND/ECMA-262.HTM but I can't garantee that these links will still be available in one or two years. Philippe
Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2000 15:37:55 UTC